West Broadway River Corridor Project

Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Facebook Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Twitter Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Linkedin Email West Broadway River Corridor Project link

UPDATE: Draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is ready for public review:

Following several years of public engagement, feasibility investigations and design work, Missoula Parks and Recreation and our project partners are excited to share a draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan. This ambitious project includes significant changes to riverfront parklands, trail systems and the Clark Fork River itself. This is a unique opportunity to provide comment on a project that will redefine how people and wildlife interact with the Clark Fork River in downtown Missoula.

The survey to give public feedback on the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is available here! Public comment period is through December 14, 2025. Please review the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan Report for more detail on the design concept.


If you would like to provide feedback on design concept above please follow this link to the survey and for a more detailed report is available here: draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan.

The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan outlines a new vision for the West Broadway River corridor. This report also captures the decision-making process and explains various aspects of the project area including plan approach, site assessments, infrastructure analyses, management challenges, key assets, preferred design concepts, alternative design concepts, feasibility and construction considerations, environmental permitting, and estimated project costs and timeline.

A thorough master planning process was critical to ensure this project aligns with community goals and to be competitive for future funding opportunities. Development of this Master Plan was made possible by the Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board’s allocation of tax increment financing (TIF) funds from Urban Renewal District II for professional design and engineering services. Project development and oversight is being coordinated by Missoula Parks and Recreation’s Ecosystem Services Division. Trout Unlimited is serving as the project manager with oversight from a steering committee with representatives from Missoula’s Parks & Recreation, Redevelopment Agency and Public Works & Mobility departments, and Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks. A consultant team including SWCA Environmental Consultants (formerly River Design Group), Morrison-Maierle Engineering, Field Studio Landscape Architects, and Recreation Engineering & Planning were contracted to develop the Master plan.

The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan design elements:

  • Silver's Park Boat Ramp Reconstruction: The existing boat ramp will be rebuilt to improve safety and function. Improvements include widening the boat ramp and angling the boat ramp downstream to increase ramp length and reduce the slope and construction of an eddy to ease loading and unloading. An adjacent pedestrian trail and stone terracing will accommodate increased use in this area.
  • South Bank Grading, Stabilization & Vegetation: Restoration and revegetation of the south bank is proposed to achieve stability, habitat, and safety objectives. The proposed work would employ a natural channel design approach that includes re-building the bank, extending the bank out into the river, and establishing a narrow floodplain bench planted with native riparian vegetation.
  • Main Channel Debris Removal & Construction of Class II Rapid: The entire project area is riddled with concrete and metal debris that poses safety hazards to wildlife and the public. Following the removal of man-made materials a Class II rapid will be constructed to create a grade control at the crest of the rapid to divert a portion of available river flow into a newly constructed side channel. This rapid will improve recreational experiences while also providing enhanced upstream fish passage and improved aquatic habitat.
  • Irrigation Ditch Infrastructure Removal: The concrete irrigation headgate structure will be demolished, and the abandoned ditch behind the headgate adjacent to Downtown Lions Park will be filled in. An estimated 2,600 CY of imported or native fill will be placed in the ditch to restore the surface to match the elevation of the adjacent park and trail. This area, once flattened and revegetated, will expand Downtown Lions Park by formally connecting the park to the adjacent riparian area along the Clark Fork River.
  • Side Channel Restoration & Overflows: Much of the fill needed to fill-in the Flynn Lowney Ditch and create a bench for Ron’s River Front trail extension would be generated by digging a new perennial side channel along the north bank of West Broadway Island. The downstream end of the new side channel would tie into the existing slack-water alcove below the California St. Bridge. This channel will be designed to safely accommodate floater passage, serve the wave feature, while also providing aquatic and terrestrial habitat. To protect the side channel during higher flows, overflow channels are included in the side channel design. These overflow channels would be situated at the upstream end of the side channel and would provide locations for controlled overtopping of the side channel banks during high flow to convey water back to the main Clark Fork River channel. The overflow channels would not only reduce potential for flood damage to the side channel but also provide routing and storage of instream debris onto the head of the West Broadway Island.
  • North Bank Grading & Revegetation: The steep north bank of the Clark Fork River between Burton and Hawthorne Streets will be regraded and expanded to create gentler overall slopes in the area between private property and the river. The upland bench, outside of the floodplain, will accommodate the extension of Ron’s Riverfront Trail. The riparian bench will accommodate natural surface trails, river access points and riparian forests.
  • Ron's River Trail & South Riverfront Trail Improvements: The design proposes an extension of Ron’s River Trail on the North bank from its current terminus at Burton Street to Scott Street. A protected shared-use trail is intended to replace the existing bike lane and sidewalk facilities between Scott St. and the Bitterroot Branch trail. It will provide an improved experience by protecting trail users from vehicles with a raised median wide planted with trees.
  • West Broadway Island Habitat Improvement & Protection: West Broadway Island provides important habitat for wildlife migrating through the Missoula Valley. This project will restore and improve this habitat while also establishing an oasis for wildlife within a dense urban landscape. Recreational access to the island will be limited in order to protect riparian habitats. Widening the side channel and removing the bridges from the mainland to the island removes terrestrial access to the island. Establishing “float-in” only access to the island will reduce human impacts protecting spring and early summer migratory bird nesting seasons when there is high flow.
  • Recreation Wave Feature: A recreational wave feature is proposed at the downstream end of the side channel. This feature will be designed with river-board surfing as the primary use but will be navigable by other watercrafts. The recreational wave feature will be designed as a fixed feature (no adjustable components) and flows to the wave will be controlled by the design of the side channel and the upstream overflow channels. The feature will be designed to benefit the largest numbers of users during peak river use season. The feature will be designed to be navigable by all river users and emergency services personnel, with no portage necessary.
  • River Access Points: On both sides of the river, natural surfaces access trails will connect paved commuter trails to adjacent riparian areas and designated river access points. Establishment of sustainable river access points is essential for protection of streamside vegetation and maintenance of bank stability throughout the project area. These access points will vary in size and may or may not be hardened based on anticipated use.

For more detailed descriptions of project elements and information regarding feasibility and design considerations please read the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan & to provide feedback via survey please click here.


Project Timeline:

November 17, 2025, to December 14, 2025:

  • The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is available to the public for feedback.
  • Project partners provide multiple presentations and updates to City boards and committees. All meetings are open to the public.

Early 2026:

  • Feedback from the public comment period and public meetings will be used to finalize the West Broadway River Corridor Master plan.
  • A final draft of the Master plan will be reviewed by the Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board and the Missoula Parks and Recreation Board. These boards will a make a recommendation to City Council on the adoption of the master plan.
  • Budget requests to fund design and engineering of the project will occur.

Fall 2026:

  • 30% concept-appropriate level of design will allow for partners to initiate environmental compliance and permit discussions with applicable agencies.
  • Efforts begin to raise funds for pursue construction funding and grant applications.

2027:

  • 60% design concept: appropriate level of design to demonstrate technical feasibility and apply for permit applications.
  • Fundraising continues.

Spring 2028:

  • 100% design concepts-construction ready plans, specifications and bid documents suitable for procuring a construction contractor.
  • Permitting

Summer 2028:

  • Construction Phase 1 dependent on funding

Summer 2029:

  • Construction Phase 2 dependent on funding

June 30, 2031:

  • Missoula Redevelopment Agency Urban Renewal District II sunset

Project Overview:

The West Broadway River Corridor Project aims to improve ecological, recreational, and safety conditions along the Clark Fork River between McCormick Park and the California Street Bridge. Project partners include the City's Parks and Recreation and Public Works and Mobility Departments, the Missoula Redevelopment Agency, Trout Unlimited, and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

The West Broadway River Corridor project's primary goals include:

  • Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Enhance recreation access.

  • Increase public safety.

  • Improve instream river conditions.

  • Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

You can read more about the project goals in the Memorandum of Understanding between the project partners here, and see results of a public survey about these goals from September 2023 here.

Project Planning Area

The West Broadway River Corridor project includes the Clark Fork River, all riparian areas, adjacent trail connections, the entirety of West Broadway Island Natural Area and portions of Downtown Lions, Silvers, and McCormick Parks. Planning will involve thorough analyses of river hydraulics, hydrology, and ecology; a comprehensive understanding of how people currently use the project area; and anticipation of future recreational use trends. The West Broadway River Corridor project will implement and/or facilitate future implementation of features highlighted in these other area Master Plans.

Project Goals (Adopted in 2023)

  1. Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Remove debris armoring banks, restore with natural materials.
  • Plant native species at high density for quick revegetation.
  • Increase seasonal side channels on Broadway Island.
  • Mitigate current and future human impacts.

  1. Enhance recreation access.

  • Connect Downtown Lions Park by filling irrigation ditch.
  • Protect existing bridges and trails on Broadway Island
  • Evaluate improved mobility access.
  • Connect north riverbank trails.
  • Explore options for in-stream recreation features.
  • Blend recreation access and river function.

  1. Increase public safety.

  • Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails.
  • Increase visibility and activity in parks.
  • Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy.
  • Consider flood protection.
  • Improve floater passage.

  1. Improve instream river conditions.

  • Remove diversion structure, debris, and irrigation infrastructure.
  • Restore 20-30 cubic feet per second (cfs) of flow to the Clark Fork River.
  • Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat.
  • Limit soil erosion into river.

  1. Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

  • Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits.
  • Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation.
  • Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity.
  • Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits.
  • Address long-term maintenance challenges

Past Draft Master Plan Concepts:

Three potential draft master plan concepts were shared in Fall of 2024 for public feedback which informed the final draft West Broadway Corridor Master Plan. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey, by email, or letters. A summary of the results from the Fall of 2024 survey can be viewed here.

UPDATE: Draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is ready for public review:

Following several years of public engagement, feasibility investigations and design work, Missoula Parks and Recreation and our project partners are excited to share a draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan. This ambitious project includes significant changes to riverfront parklands, trail systems and the Clark Fork River itself. This is a unique opportunity to provide comment on a project that will redefine how people and wildlife interact with the Clark Fork River in downtown Missoula.

The survey to give public feedback on the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is available here! Public comment period is through December 14, 2025. Please review the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan Report for more detail on the design concept.


If you would like to provide feedback on design concept above please follow this link to the survey and for a more detailed report is available here: draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan.

The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan outlines a new vision for the West Broadway River corridor. This report also captures the decision-making process and explains various aspects of the project area including plan approach, site assessments, infrastructure analyses, management challenges, key assets, preferred design concepts, alternative design concepts, feasibility and construction considerations, environmental permitting, and estimated project costs and timeline.

A thorough master planning process was critical to ensure this project aligns with community goals and to be competitive for future funding opportunities. Development of this Master Plan was made possible by the Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board’s allocation of tax increment financing (TIF) funds from Urban Renewal District II for professional design and engineering services. Project development and oversight is being coordinated by Missoula Parks and Recreation’s Ecosystem Services Division. Trout Unlimited is serving as the project manager with oversight from a steering committee with representatives from Missoula’s Parks & Recreation, Redevelopment Agency and Public Works & Mobility departments, and Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks. A consultant team including SWCA Environmental Consultants (formerly River Design Group), Morrison-Maierle Engineering, Field Studio Landscape Architects, and Recreation Engineering & Planning were contracted to develop the Master plan.

The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan design elements:

  • Silver's Park Boat Ramp Reconstruction: The existing boat ramp will be rebuilt to improve safety and function. Improvements include widening the boat ramp and angling the boat ramp downstream to increase ramp length and reduce the slope and construction of an eddy to ease loading and unloading. An adjacent pedestrian trail and stone terracing will accommodate increased use in this area.
  • South Bank Grading, Stabilization & Vegetation: Restoration and revegetation of the south bank is proposed to achieve stability, habitat, and safety objectives. The proposed work would employ a natural channel design approach that includes re-building the bank, extending the bank out into the river, and establishing a narrow floodplain bench planted with native riparian vegetation.
  • Main Channel Debris Removal & Construction of Class II Rapid: The entire project area is riddled with concrete and metal debris that poses safety hazards to wildlife and the public. Following the removal of man-made materials a Class II rapid will be constructed to create a grade control at the crest of the rapid to divert a portion of available river flow into a newly constructed side channel. This rapid will improve recreational experiences while also providing enhanced upstream fish passage and improved aquatic habitat.
  • Irrigation Ditch Infrastructure Removal: The concrete irrigation headgate structure will be demolished, and the abandoned ditch behind the headgate adjacent to Downtown Lions Park will be filled in. An estimated 2,600 CY of imported or native fill will be placed in the ditch to restore the surface to match the elevation of the adjacent park and trail. This area, once flattened and revegetated, will expand Downtown Lions Park by formally connecting the park to the adjacent riparian area along the Clark Fork River.
  • Side Channel Restoration & Overflows: Much of the fill needed to fill-in the Flynn Lowney Ditch and create a bench for Ron’s River Front trail extension would be generated by digging a new perennial side channel along the north bank of West Broadway Island. The downstream end of the new side channel would tie into the existing slack-water alcove below the California St. Bridge. This channel will be designed to safely accommodate floater passage, serve the wave feature, while also providing aquatic and terrestrial habitat. To protect the side channel during higher flows, overflow channels are included in the side channel design. These overflow channels would be situated at the upstream end of the side channel and would provide locations for controlled overtopping of the side channel banks during high flow to convey water back to the main Clark Fork River channel. The overflow channels would not only reduce potential for flood damage to the side channel but also provide routing and storage of instream debris onto the head of the West Broadway Island.
  • North Bank Grading & Revegetation: The steep north bank of the Clark Fork River between Burton and Hawthorne Streets will be regraded and expanded to create gentler overall slopes in the area between private property and the river. The upland bench, outside of the floodplain, will accommodate the extension of Ron’s Riverfront Trail. The riparian bench will accommodate natural surface trails, river access points and riparian forests.
  • Ron's River Trail & South Riverfront Trail Improvements: The design proposes an extension of Ron’s River Trail on the North bank from its current terminus at Burton Street to Scott Street. A protected shared-use trail is intended to replace the existing bike lane and sidewalk facilities between Scott St. and the Bitterroot Branch trail. It will provide an improved experience by protecting trail users from vehicles with a raised median wide planted with trees.
  • West Broadway Island Habitat Improvement & Protection: West Broadway Island provides important habitat for wildlife migrating through the Missoula Valley. This project will restore and improve this habitat while also establishing an oasis for wildlife within a dense urban landscape. Recreational access to the island will be limited in order to protect riparian habitats. Widening the side channel and removing the bridges from the mainland to the island removes terrestrial access to the island. Establishing “float-in” only access to the island will reduce human impacts protecting spring and early summer migratory bird nesting seasons when there is high flow.
  • Recreation Wave Feature: A recreational wave feature is proposed at the downstream end of the side channel. This feature will be designed with river-board surfing as the primary use but will be navigable by other watercrafts. The recreational wave feature will be designed as a fixed feature (no adjustable components) and flows to the wave will be controlled by the design of the side channel and the upstream overflow channels. The feature will be designed to benefit the largest numbers of users during peak river use season. The feature will be designed to be navigable by all river users and emergency services personnel, with no portage necessary.
  • River Access Points: On both sides of the river, natural surfaces access trails will connect paved commuter trails to adjacent riparian areas and designated river access points. Establishment of sustainable river access points is essential for protection of streamside vegetation and maintenance of bank stability throughout the project area. These access points will vary in size and may or may not be hardened based on anticipated use.

For more detailed descriptions of project elements and information regarding feasibility and design considerations please read the draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan & to provide feedback via survey please click here.


Project Timeline:

November 17, 2025, to December 14, 2025:

  • The draft West Broadway River Corridor Master Plan is available to the public for feedback.
  • Project partners provide multiple presentations and updates to City boards and committees. All meetings are open to the public.

Early 2026:

  • Feedback from the public comment period and public meetings will be used to finalize the West Broadway River Corridor Master plan.
  • A final draft of the Master plan will be reviewed by the Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board and the Missoula Parks and Recreation Board. These boards will a make a recommendation to City Council on the adoption of the master plan.
  • Budget requests to fund design and engineering of the project will occur.

Fall 2026:

  • 30% concept-appropriate level of design will allow for partners to initiate environmental compliance and permit discussions with applicable agencies.
  • Efforts begin to raise funds for pursue construction funding and grant applications.

2027:

  • 60% design concept: appropriate level of design to demonstrate technical feasibility and apply for permit applications.
  • Fundraising continues.

Spring 2028:

  • 100% design concepts-construction ready plans, specifications and bid documents suitable for procuring a construction contractor.
  • Permitting

Summer 2028:

  • Construction Phase 1 dependent on funding

Summer 2029:

  • Construction Phase 2 dependent on funding

June 30, 2031:

  • Missoula Redevelopment Agency Urban Renewal District II sunset

Project Overview:

The West Broadway River Corridor Project aims to improve ecological, recreational, and safety conditions along the Clark Fork River between McCormick Park and the California Street Bridge. Project partners include the City's Parks and Recreation and Public Works and Mobility Departments, the Missoula Redevelopment Agency, Trout Unlimited, and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

The West Broadway River Corridor project's primary goals include:

  • Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Enhance recreation access.

  • Increase public safety.

  • Improve instream river conditions.

  • Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

You can read more about the project goals in the Memorandum of Understanding between the project partners here, and see results of a public survey about these goals from September 2023 here.

Project Planning Area

The West Broadway River Corridor project includes the Clark Fork River, all riparian areas, adjacent trail connections, the entirety of West Broadway Island Natural Area and portions of Downtown Lions, Silvers, and McCormick Parks. Planning will involve thorough analyses of river hydraulics, hydrology, and ecology; a comprehensive understanding of how people currently use the project area; and anticipation of future recreational use trends. The West Broadway River Corridor project will implement and/or facilitate future implementation of features highlighted in these other area Master Plans.

Project Goals (Adopted in 2023)

  1. Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Remove debris armoring banks, restore with natural materials.
  • Plant native species at high density for quick revegetation.
  • Increase seasonal side channels on Broadway Island.
  • Mitigate current and future human impacts.

  1. Enhance recreation access.

  • Connect Downtown Lions Park by filling irrigation ditch.
  • Protect existing bridges and trails on Broadway Island
  • Evaluate improved mobility access.
  • Connect north riverbank trails.
  • Explore options for in-stream recreation features.
  • Blend recreation access and river function.

  1. Increase public safety.

  • Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails.
  • Increase visibility and activity in parks.
  • Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy.
  • Consider flood protection.
  • Improve floater passage.

  1. Improve instream river conditions.

  • Remove diversion structure, debris, and irrigation infrastructure.
  • Restore 20-30 cubic feet per second (cfs) of flow to the Clark Fork River.
  • Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat.
  • Limit soil erosion into river.

  1. Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

  • Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits.
  • Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation.
  • Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity.
  • Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits.
  • Address long-term maintenance challenges

Past Draft Master Plan Concepts:

Three potential draft master plan concepts were shared in Fall of 2024 for public feedback which informed the final draft West Broadway Corridor Master Plan. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey, by email, or letters. A summary of the results from the Fall of 2024 survey can be viewed here.

Have a question about the project?

This project is still in the early planning stages. The project partners have not yet found funding to carry out the plan. Funding could come from public-private partnerships, grants, donations, or other sources. Part of the planning process is to identify potential funding sources.

The conceptual master plan will go through a long public process and requires final approval from the City Council. If the plan needs City funding for implementation, the Council must approve that funding.

Please note: public comment is currently being accepted through the online survey through September 21. Questions asked here will be answered but are not tabulated as public comment.

You need to be signed in to add your question.

  • Share Can we focus on a more contiguous trail along the northern portion of the river? on Facebook Share Can we focus on a more contiguous trail along the northern portion of the river? on Twitter Share Can we focus on a more contiguous trail along the northern portion of the river? on Linkedin Email Can we focus on a more contiguous trail along the northern portion of the river? link

    Can we focus on a more contiguous trail along the northern portion of the river?

    Bedstuy asked almost 2 years ago

    Thank you for your interest. Improving multi-modal connectivity in the project area is a major focus of the project, since it would enhance access to recreation, improve public safety, and contribute to the holistic success of the project. Connection of the existing pieces of Ron's River Trail is a challenge due to multiple property ownerships and steep slopes along the riverbank. However, the re-grading and restoration work involved in this project also provides a critical opportunity to incorporate the space needs of a trail corridor.

  • Share Why? Why are you doing this? The city of Missoula can’t even afford to provide basic services like fire protection. Yet some infinite wisdom has decided they need to spend millions for a few to ride a wave. For how many months a year? Does this mean anyone can do whatever they please with any river, stream, or brook? Or is the City of Missoula privileged in their capacity to ruin things? What happens when rivers are altered? Disasters. Nature will make it the way it wants it. Don’t be stupid and stop wasting money on improvements that aren’t. Do something with Marshall canyon. on Facebook Share Why? Why are you doing this? The city of Missoula can’t even afford to provide basic services like fire protection. Yet some infinite wisdom has decided they need to spend millions for a few to ride a wave. For how many months a year? Does this mean anyone can do whatever they please with any river, stream, or brook? Or is the City of Missoula privileged in their capacity to ruin things? What happens when rivers are altered? Disasters. Nature will make it the way it wants it. Don’t be stupid and stop wasting money on improvements that aren’t. Do something with Marshall canyon. on Twitter Share Why? Why are you doing this? The city of Missoula can’t even afford to provide basic services like fire protection. Yet some infinite wisdom has decided they need to spend millions for a few to ride a wave. For how many months a year? Does this mean anyone can do whatever they please with any river, stream, or brook? Or is the City of Missoula privileged in their capacity to ruin things? What happens when rivers are altered? Disasters. Nature will make it the way it wants it. Don’t be stupid and stop wasting money on improvements that aren’t. Do something with Marshall canyon. on Linkedin Email Why? Why are you doing this? The city of Missoula can’t even afford to provide basic services like fire protection. Yet some infinite wisdom has decided they need to spend millions for a few to ride a wave. For how many months a year? Does this mean anyone can do whatever they please with any river, stream, or brook? Or is the City of Missoula privileged in their capacity to ruin things? What happens when rivers are altered? Disasters. Nature will make it the way it wants it. Don’t be stupid and stop wasting money on improvements that aren’t. Do something with Marshall canyon. link

    Why? Why are you doing this? The city of Missoula can’t even afford to provide basic services like fire protection. Yet some infinite wisdom has decided they need to spend millions for a few to ride a wave. For how many months a year? Does this mean anyone can do whatever they please with any river, stream, or brook? Or is the City of Missoula privileged in their capacity to ruin things? What happens when rivers are altered? Disasters. Nature will make it the way it wants it. Don’t be stupid and stop wasting money on improvements that aren’t. Do something with Marshall canyon.

    Chester asked about 1 year ago

    Chester, thank you for your questions. The West Broadway River project was initiated to improve conditions in the Clark Fork River and adjacent areas. This project really began when the City, in partnership with MT Fish Wildlife and Parks and the Clark Fork Coalition, purchased the Flynn-Lowney irrigation ditch. That acquisition provided the City with valuable water rights available for drinking and fire protection as our City grows. It also saves our community millions of dollars in initial development and long-term road maintenance costs (no need to build dozens of ditch crossings & bridges) in the Mullan/Airport area. 

    Our community has identified MANY issues and opportunities in this several impacted section of the Clark Fork River. This includes collapsing riverbanks, disconnected pedestrian routes, degraded riparian areas, tons of waste construction debris, and numerous safety challenges. Without action, we will continue to see the issues identified on the Issues and Opportunities Map on this page, worsen and become more costly to fix. There are also many opportunities to make improvements within this stretch of river. 

    In order to fix issues,  improve river function, and establish community trail connections, a significant amount of engineering, permitting and construction will be required. The project consultant team has significant experience in river restoration and rehabilitation projects, and their analysis at each step strongly weighs benefits to river health. In a Fall 2024 public survey that asked about proposed changes to the project area, a wave feature in an engineered side channel saw strong support and limited but important criticism. While a wave feature would add a minimal amount of construction cost to this very large project, both construction and long-term mainteance costs of ALL built features (eg. trails, boat ramp, bridges, trailheads etc.) must be considered. We are working with our project consultants to develop both construction costs and long-term maintenance requirements so our community can make informed decisions as we develop a final master plan for this project. As you mentioned in your comments, cost is not the only decision-making metric we will use. Weighing overall cost with potential public benefit is very important. Similar projects in other cities, and our own, have shown that popular recreation features can draw people, both recreationists and spectators, to an area and attract adjacent development to areas experiencing urban blight. 

    All potential modifications to the river are being thoroughly vetted and will go through all applicable permitting processes. Any recreation feature built below the high water mark must be reviewed & permitted though local, state & federal agencies. Any built feature on the riverbed, which would require recurring maintenance, also requires a lease agreement with the Dept. of Natural Resources.  

  • Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Facebook Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Twitter Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Linkedin Email Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? link

    Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts?

    Kyle J asked about 2 years ago

    Project Goal 3 addresses restoration of floodplain and riparian habitat:

    • Remove debris armoring banks, and restore with natural materials. 
  • Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Facebook Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Twitter Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Linkedin Email Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks link

    Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks

    Ric Mcleod asked about 2 years ago

    Thank you for the question. The City recognizes that homelessness is a complex issue that impacts the use and perception of public spaces like West Broadway Islands. City officials are working closely with social service providers to increase shelter capacity and connect individuals experiencing homelessness with additional resources. However, fully resolving homelessness extends beyond the scope of any single department or project.

    For the West Broadway River Corridor (WBRC), our goal is to find solutions that protect public health and safety while being compassionate to all community members. This may involve deterring extended camping in the park while increasing outreach and access to services. But partnerships across government, nonprofits and the community will be key. We hope improvements to WBRC will benefit all residents. Please feel free to share other suggestions as we develop plans for the park.

  • Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Facebook Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Twitter Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Linkedin Email Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? link

    Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown?

    Bruce1 asked about 2 years ago

    Thank you for your comment. This complex, multifaceted project is in the very early planning stages. At this stage, we're presenting a broad suite of possibilities for residents to consider. At the same time, we are collecting a significant amount of geophysical data from the site. We will use that data and public feedback to create a spectrum of design alternatives to share with the community. We hope that by spring 2024, we will have a master plan that meets community needs, is fiscally responsible and feasible to implement.

    River work of this magnitude will require a variety of local, state and federal permits. Before construction can begin, project partners must demonstrate that the plan can achieve adequate fish passage, water quality, riparian health, flood mitigation, endangered species protection and public safety—regardless of whether a recreational wave is included.

    Again, thank you for your comments. It's incredibly important for us to receive feedback from folks who are familiar with the project area and passionate about the Clark Fork. Please be sure to sign up to receive updates when we post more information to Engage Missoula.

  • Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Facebook Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Twitter Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Linkedin Email Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. link

    Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function.

    Jack Peabody asked about 2 years ago

    As part of this project's public scoping and design, we are exploring options to expand recreation access and opportunities along the river. Project Goal #4 references potential priorities, including exploration of in-stream wave features.

    During this public scoping period, we need your input. Please take a few minutes to complete our public comment survey by September 21. Let us know how you currently use the river and adjacent parks and trails and what access or recreation options you want added. Some potential options include new and improved trails, new walk-in river access points, in-stream wave features, an improved boat ramp and more. 

    Our team will use public feedback and geophysical data collected on-site to develop multiple design alternatives. We will present these alternatives later this winter in a second public comment period. There will be ample opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of each design and share your thoughts. 

    Ultimately, we want to find the right balance between improving natural river function and enhancing responsible public recreation access. With your input, we can ensure the final plans align with what matters most to residents. Please participate in the survey and help shape the future of your river!

  • Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Facebook Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Twitter Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Linkedin Email Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? link

    Is there any talk of including a surfing wave?

    atlasm asked about 2 years ago

    We appreciate your interest in the potential wave features along the river as part of this restoration project. As outlined in Project Goal #4, we are actively exploring in-stream wave features to expand recreation access and enhance the user experience. Our team will develop several design alternatives based on public input and on-site data collection. 

    We encourage everyone to share their perspectives on wave features and other potential amenities through the public comment survey open until September 21. Your feedback will directly inform the proposals we present this winter. There will be additional opportunities to weigh in on the pros and cons of each design. 

    We aim to find the right mix of recreation options that align with community priorities. Please make your voice heard in the survey so we can factor local needs into the final plans. Together, we can shape an improved river that balances ecological and recreational goals.

  • Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Facebook Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Twitter Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Linkedin Email Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave link

    Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave

    Henri asked about 2 years ago

    An in-stream wave feature is one of the recreational access options currently on the table for this project. As part of Project Goal #4, our team is exploring the feasibility and desirability of incorporating wave features to enhance the user experience along the river. 

    We recognize varied perspectives on whether these amenities should be part of the final plans. That's why we need to hear from you! Your input through the public comment survey open until 9/21 will directly inform the design alternatives we develop this winter. Once we present the proposals, there will be additional opportunities to share feedback on the pros and cons of each option.

    We aim to balance ecological restoration and recreational enhancements. We encourage you to make your voice heard on if and how wave features could improve the river while aligning with broader restoration goals. Your participation in shaping these plans is greatly appreciated!

Page last updated: 20 Nov 2025, 03:35 PM