West Broadway River Corridor Project

Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Facebook Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Twitter Share West Broadway River Corridor Project on Linkedin Email West Broadway River Corridor Project link

The public review period for the draft master plan concepts ended on November 25th. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey or by email. A summary of the results of the survey can be viewed here.


Project Overview

The West Broadway River Corridor Project aims to improve ecological, recreational, and safety conditions along the Clark Fork River between McCormick Park and the California Street Bridge. Project partners include the City's Parks and Recreation and Public Works and Mobility Departments, the Missoula Redevelopment Agency, Trout Unlimited, and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

The West Broadway River Corridor project's primary goals include:

  • Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Enhance recreation access.

  • Increase public safety.

  • Improve instream river conditions.

  • Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

You can read more about the project goals in the Memorandum of Understanding between the project partners here, and see results of a public survey about these goals from September 2023 here.

Project Planning Area

The West Broadway River Corridor project includes the Clark Fork River, all riparian areas, adjacent trail connections, the entirety of West Broadway Island Natural Area and portions of Downtown Lions, Silvers, and McCormick Parks. Planning will involve thorough analyses of river hydraulics, hydrology, and ecology; a comprehensive understanding of how people currently use the project area; and anticipation of future recreational use trends. The West Broadway River Corridor project will implement and/or facilitate future implementation of features highlighted in these other area Master Plans. There is also the potential that final design of the West Broadway River Corridor master plan may require adaptations of adjacent area Master Plans within the planning area.


Master Planning Process A thorough master planning process is critical in order to ensure we are alignment with the public’s goals, and to be competitive for grants to help us implement the project. The Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board approved using tax increment financing (TIF) funds from Urban Renewal District II for master planning professional and engineering services. Trout Unlimited is serving as project manager with oversight from the project working group, and the consultant team includes River Design Group, Morrison-Maierle, Field Studio Landscape Architects, and Recreation Engineering and Planning.


2023-2024 Planning efforts included:

  • Conducting a public survey on the project goals (see results here)

  • Compiling relevant planning documents and GIS mapping.

  • Summarizing existing hydrologic and hydraulic data.

  • Evaluating survey and bathymetric data.

  • Identifying data gaps.

  • Conducting geomorphic and vegetation surveys.

  • Performing supplemental surveys.

  • Developing conceptual design alternatives.

  • Assessing feasibility and cost-benefit analysis.

  • Confirming permitting requirements.

  • Updating and prioritizing opportunities.

  • Preparing conceptual drawings.


The Draft Master Plan Concepts:

The public review period for the draft master plan concepts has ended. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey or by email. A summary of the results of the survey can be viewed here.

Before taking the survey, participants were asked to review the following information:

  • Full public review package including existing conditions, concept plans, concept sections, and image board
  • Existing Conditions
  • Concept 1 - Concept 1 includes all of the basic components needed to meet the project goals. These basic components are also featured on Concepts 2 & 3. They include rebuilding the Silver Park boat ramp to improve function and safety; stabilizing and re-vegetating eroding portions of the South bank; removing non-natural debris in the river; removing all irrigation ditch infrastructure; re-vegetating side channel banks; and filling the ditch through Lions Park to improve connectivity to the adjacent riparian area. To improve trail connectivity on the North bank Concept 1 also includes building a protected on-street shared use path along the south side of Broadway Avenue between Burton Street – where Ron’s River Trail currently ends – East to the railroad bridge. Concept 1 depicts the least amount of change and would cost the least to build and maintain. The cost to build is estimated at $2-3 million.
  • Concept 2 - Concept 2 includes all of the basic components needed to meet project goals AND includes additional improvements for river recreation, trail connectivity and wildlife habitat. On the North bank, the side channel is realigned farther from private property to allow for construction of an upland bench to accommodate an extension of Ron’s River Trail between Burton and Hawthorne streets. This paved commuter trail would connect to a new protected shared use path along the south side of Broadway Avenue east to the railroad bridge. Additional river recreation and habitat improvements include adding a class II rapid in the main channel; regrading the side channel to convey flows for the majority of the year to accommodate floater passage and to promote native vegetation. This concept also includes micro-grading on West Broadway Island to create wetland habitat. This concept would cost more to construct and maintain than Concept 1 but would cost less than Concept 3. The cost to build is estimated at $3-5 million.
  • Concept 3 - Concept 3 includes all of the basic components needed to meet project goals and several components featured in Concept 2. Concept 3 also includes major trail improvements, a specialized recreational feature, and limitations on public access to protect habitat. Construction of a riparian bench with natural surface trails North of the side channel would increase recreational opportunities and riparian habitat. A specialized recreation feature, a river-surfing wave, is featured in the side channel. The side channel would be realigned, deepened and widened to capture year-round flow to support the wave feature and increase aquatic habitat complexity & diversity. The new channel geometry requires removal of the existing bridges to West Broadway Island. In order to prioritize habitat protection on the island and to limit fill within the floodplain no new bridges would be constructed. This concept would cost the most to construct but the cost to maintain may be similar to Concept 2. The cost to build is estimated at $5-7 million.
  • Conceptual Cross Sections of all 3 concepts
  • Image Board for all 3 concepts


Next steps include:


  • Creating a single draft master plan concept based on the feedback and project goals

  • Evaluating feasibility and cost of the draft master plan

  • Seeking public feedback on the draft master plan

  • Pursuing master plan adoption by the City and Partners Applying for outside grant funding

Project Goals

  1. Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Remove debris armoring banks, restore with natural materials.
  • Plant native species at high density for quick revegetation.
  • Increase seasonal side channels on Broadway Island.
  • Mitigate current and future human impacts.

  1. Enhance recreation access.

  • Connect Downtown Lions Park by filling irrigation ditch.
  • Protect existing bridges and trails on Broadway Island
  • Evaluate improved mobility access.
  • Connect north riverbank trails.
  • Explore options for in-stream recreation features.
  • Blend recreation access and river function.

  1. Increase public safety.

  • Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails.
  • Increase visibility and activity in parks.
  • Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy.
  • Consider flood protection.
  • Improve floater passage.

  1. Improve instream river conditions.

  • Remove diversion structure, debris, and irrigation infrastructure.
  • Restore 20-30 cubic feet per second (cfs) of flow to the Clark Fork River.
  • Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat.
  • Limit soil erosion into river.

  1. Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

  • Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits.
  • Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation.
  • Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity.
  • Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits.
  • Address long-term maintenance challenges

The public review period for the draft master plan concepts ended on November 25th. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey or by email. A summary of the results of the survey can be viewed here.


Project Overview

The West Broadway River Corridor Project aims to improve ecological, recreational, and safety conditions along the Clark Fork River between McCormick Park and the California Street Bridge. Project partners include the City's Parks and Recreation and Public Works and Mobility Departments, the Missoula Redevelopment Agency, Trout Unlimited, and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

The West Broadway River Corridor project's primary goals include:

  • Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Enhance recreation access.

  • Increase public safety.

  • Improve instream river conditions.

  • Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

You can read more about the project goals in the Memorandum of Understanding between the project partners here, and see results of a public survey about these goals from September 2023 here.

Project Planning Area

The West Broadway River Corridor project includes the Clark Fork River, all riparian areas, adjacent trail connections, the entirety of West Broadway Island Natural Area and portions of Downtown Lions, Silvers, and McCormick Parks. Planning will involve thorough analyses of river hydraulics, hydrology, and ecology; a comprehensive understanding of how people currently use the project area; and anticipation of future recreational use trends. The West Broadway River Corridor project will implement and/or facilitate future implementation of features highlighted in these other area Master Plans. There is also the potential that final design of the West Broadway River Corridor master plan may require adaptations of adjacent area Master Plans within the planning area.


Master Planning Process A thorough master planning process is critical in order to ensure we are alignment with the public’s goals, and to be competitive for grants to help us implement the project. The Missoula Redevelopment Agency Board approved using tax increment financing (TIF) funds from Urban Renewal District II for master planning professional and engineering services. Trout Unlimited is serving as project manager with oversight from the project working group, and the consultant team includes River Design Group, Morrison-Maierle, Field Studio Landscape Architects, and Recreation Engineering and Planning.


2023-2024 Planning efforts included:

  • Conducting a public survey on the project goals (see results here)

  • Compiling relevant planning documents and GIS mapping.

  • Summarizing existing hydrologic and hydraulic data.

  • Evaluating survey and bathymetric data.

  • Identifying data gaps.

  • Conducting geomorphic and vegetation surveys.

  • Performing supplemental surveys.

  • Developing conceptual design alternatives.

  • Assessing feasibility and cost-benefit analysis.

  • Confirming permitting requirements.

  • Updating and prioritizing opportunities.

  • Preparing conceptual drawings.


The Draft Master Plan Concepts:

The public review period for the draft master plan concepts has ended. Thank you for all who provided feedback through the survey or by email. A summary of the results of the survey can be viewed here.

Before taking the survey, participants were asked to review the following information:

  • Full public review package including existing conditions, concept plans, concept sections, and image board
  • Existing Conditions
  • Concept 1 - Concept 1 includes all of the basic components needed to meet the project goals. These basic components are also featured on Concepts 2 & 3. They include rebuilding the Silver Park boat ramp to improve function and safety; stabilizing and re-vegetating eroding portions of the South bank; removing non-natural debris in the river; removing all irrigation ditch infrastructure; re-vegetating side channel banks; and filling the ditch through Lions Park to improve connectivity to the adjacent riparian area. To improve trail connectivity on the North bank Concept 1 also includes building a protected on-street shared use path along the south side of Broadway Avenue between Burton Street – where Ron’s River Trail currently ends – East to the railroad bridge. Concept 1 depicts the least amount of change and would cost the least to build and maintain. The cost to build is estimated at $2-3 million.
  • Concept 2 - Concept 2 includes all of the basic components needed to meet project goals AND includes additional improvements for river recreation, trail connectivity and wildlife habitat. On the North bank, the side channel is realigned farther from private property to allow for construction of an upland bench to accommodate an extension of Ron’s River Trail between Burton and Hawthorne streets. This paved commuter trail would connect to a new protected shared use path along the south side of Broadway Avenue east to the railroad bridge. Additional river recreation and habitat improvements include adding a class II rapid in the main channel; regrading the side channel to convey flows for the majority of the year to accommodate floater passage and to promote native vegetation. This concept also includes micro-grading on West Broadway Island to create wetland habitat. This concept would cost more to construct and maintain than Concept 1 but would cost less than Concept 3. The cost to build is estimated at $3-5 million.
  • Concept 3 - Concept 3 includes all of the basic components needed to meet project goals and several components featured in Concept 2. Concept 3 also includes major trail improvements, a specialized recreational feature, and limitations on public access to protect habitat. Construction of a riparian bench with natural surface trails North of the side channel would increase recreational opportunities and riparian habitat. A specialized recreation feature, a river-surfing wave, is featured in the side channel. The side channel would be realigned, deepened and widened to capture year-round flow to support the wave feature and increase aquatic habitat complexity & diversity. The new channel geometry requires removal of the existing bridges to West Broadway Island. In order to prioritize habitat protection on the island and to limit fill within the floodplain no new bridges would be constructed. This concept would cost the most to construct but the cost to maintain may be similar to Concept 2. The cost to build is estimated at $5-7 million.
  • Conceptual Cross Sections of all 3 concepts
  • Image Board for all 3 concepts


Next steps include:


  • Creating a single draft master plan concept based on the feedback and project goals

  • Evaluating feasibility and cost of the draft master plan

  • Seeking public feedback on the draft master plan

  • Pursuing master plan adoption by the City and Partners Applying for outside grant funding

Project Goals

  1. Restore critical floodplain and riparian habitat.

  • Remove debris armoring banks, restore with natural materials.
  • Plant native species at high density for quick revegetation.
  • Increase seasonal side channels on Broadway Island.
  • Mitigate current and future human impacts.

  1. Enhance recreation access.

  • Connect Downtown Lions Park by filling irrigation ditch.
  • Protect existing bridges and trails on Broadway Island
  • Evaluate improved mobility access.
  • Connect north riverbank trails.
  • Explore options for in-stream recreation features.
  • Blend recreation access and river function.

  1. Increase public safety.

  • Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails.
  • Increase visibility and activity in parks.
  • Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy.
  • Consider flood protection.
  • Improve floater passage.

  1. Improve instream river conditions.

  • Remove diversion structure, debris, and irrigation infrastructure.
  • Restore 20-30 cubic feet per second (cfs) of flow to the Clark Fork River.
  • Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat.
  • Limit soil erosion into river.

  1. Design and execute a sustainable, holistic project.

  • Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits.
  • Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation.
  • Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity.
  • Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits.
  • Address long-term maintenance challenges

Have a question about the project?

This project is still in the early planning stages. The project partners have not yet found funding to carry out the plan. Funding could come from public-private partnerships, grants, donations, or other sources. Part of the planning process is to identify potential funding sources.

The conceptual master plan will go through a long public process and requires final approval from the City Council. If the plan needs City funding for implementation, the Council must approve that funding.

Please note: public comment is currently being accepted through the online survey through September 21. Questions asked here will be answered but are not tabulated as public comment.

You need to be signed in to add your question.

  • Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Facebook Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Twitter Share Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? on Linkedin Email Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts? link

    Will the cars embedded in the river banks be removed as part of the debris removal efforts?

    Kyle J asked over 1 year ago

    Project Goal 3 addresses restoration of floodplain and riparian habitat:

    • Remove debris armoring banks, and restore with natural materials. 
  • Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Facebook Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Twitter Share Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks on Linkedin Email Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks link

    Hello, How is the Island Park going to made more user friendly? What is the plan for the homeless tents that inhabit the whole area you are addressing ? Many families are intimidated by the presence of these camps and will not use the area Thanks

    Ric Mcleod asked over 1 year ago

    Thank you for the question. The City recognizes that homelessness is a complex issue that impacts the use and perception of public spaces like West Broadway Islands. City officials are working closely with social service providers to increase shelter capacity and connect individuals experiencing homelessness with additional resources. However, fully resolving homelessness extends beyond the scope of any single department or project.

    For the West Broadway River Corridor (WBRC), our goal is to find solutions that protect public health and safety while being compassionate to all community members. This may involve deterring extended camping in the park while increasing outreach and access to services. But partnerships across government, nonprofits and the community will be key. We hope improvements to WBRC will benefit all residents. Please feel free to share other suggestions as we develop plans for the park.

  • Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Facebook Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Twitter Share Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? on Linkedin Email Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown? link

    Why did the developers of the five objectives include a sub objective that will evaluate the potential for in-stream whitewater structures when these features conflict with objectives #1, #2, #3 and #5? Fake engineered whitewater structures modify normative stream and floodplain functions, thereby often adversely affecting natural instream conditions, movement of aquatic organisms (such as fish and amphibians) and the ability of certain stream stages from inundating floodplains or riparian communities. Moreover, they create hydraulics that make it difficult, and at times unsafe, for the majority of people who float the river downtown in tubes, rubber duckies and other craft that aren’t easy to maneuver. In addition, why would they City consider investing in new in-stream infrastructure that would require expensive maintenance, given the turbulence and debris present when the Clark Fork River is high? Will the City in its consideration of in-stream structures consider the expense and liability risk of creating yet another fake whitewater feature in the river that demonstrates that a small minority of river users get to dominate the look and function of the river downtown?

    Bruce1 asked over 1 year ago

    Thank you for your comment. This complex, multifaceted project is in the very early planning stages. At this stage, we're presenting a broad suite of possibilities for residents to consider. At the same time, we are collecting a significant amount of geophysical data from the site. We will use that data and public feedback to create a spectrum of design alternatives to share with the community. We hope that by spring 2024, we will have a master plan that meets community needs, is fiscally responsible and feasible to implement.

    River work of this magnitude will require a variety of local, state and federal permits. Before construction can begin, project partners must demonstrate that the plan can achieve adequate fish passage, water quality, riparian health, flood mitigation, endangered species protection and public safety—regardless of whether a recreational wave is included.

    Again, thank you for your comments. It's incredibly important for us to receive feedback from folks who are familiar with the project area and passionate about the Clark Fork. Please be sure to sign up to receive updates when we post more information to Engage Missoula.

  • Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Facebook Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Twitter Share Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. on Linkedin Email Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function. link

    Why is the Max wave plan not included in this proposal? The goals outlined in this project and the Max wave plan align but are not limited to the following regions: -Recognize environmental, recreational, and social equity benefits. -Mitigate bank erosion near stadium and trails. -Increase visibility and activity in parks. -Expand Silver Park boat ramp eddy. -Consider flood protection. Improve floater passage -Foster public-private collaboration on design, funding, and implementation. -Enhance quality of life and economic prosperity. -Consider funding, costs, and timeline to maximize benefits. -Address long-term maintenance challenges. -Recontour the riverbed to improve habitat. -Limit soil erosion into river. -Explore options for in-stream recreation features. -Blend recreation access and river function.

    Jack Peabody asked over 1 year ago

    As part of this project's public scoping and design, we are exploring options to expand recreation access and opportunities along the river. Project Goal #4 references potential priorities, including exploration of in-stream wave features.

    During this public scoping period, we need your input. Please take a few minutes to complete our public comment survey by September 21. Let us know how you currently use the river and adjacent parks and trails and what access or recreation options you want added. Some potential options include new and improved trails, new walk-in river access points, in-stream wave features, an improved boat ramp and more. 

    Our team will use public feedback and geophysical data collected on-site to develop multiple design alternatives. We will present these alternatives later this winter in a second public comment period. There will be ample opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of each design and share your thoughts. 

    Ultimately, we want to find the right balance between improving natural river function and enhancing responsible public recreation access. With your input, we can ensure the final plans align with what matters most to residents. Please participate in the survey and help shape the future of your river!

  • Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Facebook Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Twitter Share Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? on Linkedin Email Is there any talk of including a surfing wave? link

    Is there any talk of including a surfing wave?

    atlasm asked over 1 year ago

    We appreciate your interest in the potential wave features along the river as part of this restoration project. As outlined in Project Goal #4, we are actively exploring in-stream wave features to expand recreation access and enhance the user experience. Our team will develop several design alternatives based on public input and on-site data collection. 

    We encourage everyone to share their perspectives on wave features and other potential amenities through the public comment survey open until September 21. Your feedback will directly inform the proposals we present this winter. There will be additional opportunities to weigh in on the pros and cons of each design. 

    We aim to find the right mix of recreation options that align with community priorities. Please make your voice heard in the survey so we can factor local needs into the final plans. Together, we can shape an improved river that balances ecological and recreational goals.

  • Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Facebook Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Twitter Share Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave on Linkedin Email Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave link

    Max Wave will improve the whole area as well as negate erosion while providing what surely will be an incredibly successful recreation area similar to Brennans wave

    Henri asked over 1 year ago

    An in-stream wave feature is one of the recreational access options currently on the table for this project. As part of Project Goal #4, our team is exploring the feasibility and desirability of incorporating wave features to enhance the user experience along the river. 

    We recognize varied perspectives on whether these amenities should be part of the final plans. That's why we need to hear from you! Your input through the public comment survey open until 9/21 will directly inform the design alternatives we develop this winter. Once we present the proposals, there will be additional opportunities to share feedback on the pros and cons of each option.

    We aim to balance ecological restoration and recreational enhancements. We encourage you to make your voice heard on if and how wave features could improve the river while aligning with broader restoration goals. Your participation in shaping these plans is greatly appreciated!

Page last updated: 08 Jan 2025, 10:12 AM